Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Hsieh Yuan-hsin may be the suspect that is main the kidnapping and murder of Shih Chia-chin. (Image: Taiwan police)

Taiwanese online gambling ringleader Shih Chia-chin may never be a home name in cyberspace betting community, but he was infamous in his home country for the wealth he obtained by running his sites. Now, his kidnapping and murder have actually shocked the area nation. Shih's human anatomy was discovered Sunday evening in Tainan County by police. He had been allegedly murdered after being kidnapped by his chauffeur and a few others on August 18.

Chauffeur Abducted Shih at Airport

On that day, Shih was picked up at the Taoyuan airport near Taiwan by their chauffeur, Hsieh Yuan-hsin. Just three hours later, the accountant at Shih's business received a telephone call saying that Shih had been kidnapped and demanding a ransom of TW$50 million ($1.67 million). Shih's family attempted to negotiate with the kidnappers, eventually agreeing to wire TW$30 million ($1 million) to three bank that is separate.

Whenever the family nevertheless did not hear from Shih, they contacted law enforcement for assistance later that day. Hsieh evidently made a try to withdraw the transferred ransom soon thereafter, but fled when he was asked to provide identification during the bank.

Hsieh Flees to Thailand

Despite efforts from prosecutors who issued a warrant to bar him from leaving the nation, Hsieh managed to board a flight to Thailand simply hours later making use of a fake passport that used his photo but their cousin's name and details. Hsieh was spotted on airport CCTV footage on August 18.

Based on the United Daily Information, police noted that Hsieh didn't have record that is criminal which made them suspect that another individual may have planned the kidnapping. He did, but, seem to be covering their tracks, as he had used his passport that is real to a trip to Hong Kong. The passport that is fake been annulled, and Hsieh is suspected to still be in Thailand. But, authorities fear he could flee to Cambodia or Myanmar, and Thai police have actually been expected to assist into the investigation.

They also suggested that ransom might possibly not have been the motivation that is primary the crime. Hsieh fled the nation without recovering the ransom, and a valuable view was still on Shih's body when it ended up being found.

In accordance with a report from the Central Information Agency (CNA), a body was present in an area that is mountainous of County with more than 20 puncture wounds towards the back on the evening of August 24, about a week after the kidnapping took place. Shih's family was called in to spot the human anatomy, and confirmed that it was him.

Two Other Suspects in Custody

While Hsieh has not yet been apprehended, two other suspects were arrested on Monday. Full names were not available, but The China Post said that their surnames were Lin and Cheng. According to authorities, Lin confessed to being truly a part of the kidnapping plot, but stated that he did not know anything about plans to murder Shih. The two accomplices were identified surveillance that is using, which revealed they had abandoned Shih's vehicle in Greater Tainan.

Nine years ago, authorities cracked straight down on Shih's Internet gambling ring. That resulted in an 18-month suspended jail term for the man whoever fortune had been apparently worth billions of New Taiwan Dollars. Reports say that Shih had been already the victim of a kidnapping attempt four years early in the day.

PokerStars Should Wait to Enter US Markets, Says 888 CEO

888 CEO Brian Mattingley believes PokerStars is allowed back within the US, but should face a short period that is exclusionary. (Image:

PokerStars and 888 Poker are natural rivals, as the ongoing companies are two of the biggest players in today's internet poker industry. PokerStars is by far the absolute most well-known online poker site on earth these days, which may be why 888 CEO Brian Mattingley has formerly stated that permitting the Amaya-owned poker brand straight back into the US would help all organizations, by attracting more players for everyone to share. But now, Mattingley has began walking back those comments a bit, at the least with regards to permitting PokerStars free entry into lucrative American states.

According to a meeting between Mattingley and Bluff Magazine's Steve Ruddock, the 888 CEO still believes that PokerStars is good for the entire poker that is american, and claims he welcomes their return. However, he does think they should get at least a slap on the wrist before they're let back in that they gained an unfair advantage by continuing to service players in the US after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) went into effect, and that as a result.

Statement Appears to Contradict Earlier Stance

June this is a little different from comments published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ) is. In an interview with that paper's Howard Stutz, Mattingley was quoted as saying that he desired to see PokerStars come back to america just as possible.

'It will be like unleashing a 800-pound gorilla into the market, but having more players on a regulated site would gain everyone,' he said.

' We compete with PokerStars throughout Europe,' Mattingley said of his rival that is largest. 'They are a definite competitor that is formidable. But they would make all of us work much harder and it would expand the market. I'd much rather have a little slice of a large pie, than the usual big piece of a tiny cake.'

Those comments differed with people he made last month to Global Gaming company. There, he said he ended up being still against 'bad actor' clauses that will ban PokerStars from the marketplace entirely, but said that some penalties were appropriate.

' We must see the regulators saying because they were taking wagers illegally for those years, you are going to have to suffer a penalty where you can't operate for a given period of time,' Mattingley said that they can come in, but. 'I think couple of years would make some sense…as competitors, I think we should be allowed to establish our brands, which could be done in 2 years.'

No Change in Opinion, Claims Mattingley

Those statements that are seemingly incompatible to happen clarified in the Bluff interview. In it, Mattingley stated that his position has been constant all along, but that some of exactly what he said to Stutz wasn't included in the LVRJ article.

Based on Mattingley, their statements welcoming PokerStars back once again to the US markets were followed closely by a qualifier that is big in which he said '…however, I do believe they got that leading edge working in a market where everyone else was out.'

'They must not be allowed to walk into new states,' Mattingley told Bluff. He offered up that an exclusion of just one to 2 yrs is appropriate and reasonable to all or any parties, after which PokerStars should be allowed to compete like someone else.

Packer's Crown Buys 36-Year Licensing Deal for $847 million

Pleased as punch: James Packer has secured a license that is 36-year the Crown Casino in Melbourne, plus tax concessions on high rollers. (Image: Justin Benson-Cooper/

James Packer's Crown Casino in Melbourne received a license extension until 2050 from the Government of the Australian state of Victoria, which has defended its decision to allow for the multi-decade add-on. The Victoria national will additionally allow Packer to expand table games and 'pokie' (slot) devices in Crown casinos, in substitution for re payments of up to A$910 million (US$847 million).

Politicians and anti-gambling groups have called the deal 'grubby' and 'back-door,' and declare that does not have transparency. But Victoria's treasurer, Michael O'Brien, said that the contract would help investment that is economic jobs.

'This agreement provides significant benefits that are financial' he said, 'as well as improved competitiveness and investment certainty for Crown and the 8,800 people who work here.'

Crown casino president Packer was also fast to highlight the recognized economic benefits. He said that, while his company had invested $1.7 billion to update the casino, 'it had for the long time been at 'a major competitive disadvantage on the issue of taxation.

'Now,' he added, 'with the support of the government that is victorian we will have a permit that allows us to compete on a level playing field to help drive tourism, jobs and economic advantage for the state.'

Anti-Gambling Backlash

Australian Churches Gambling Taskforce Chairman Rev. Tim Costello had been among the many who spoke out against the deal, but.

' This whole thing smells,' he said. 'This close to an election, why would you do a deal without transparency, and with such haste, when it has major implications for the public that is victorian? Australia has 20 percent of all the earth's pokies, it has the population that is biggest of problem gamblers in the world, yet it has gone through without the debate or discussion.'

Five future governments, he added, would be bound to your deal. 'I think people now has a cynicism that is world-weary politicians, and they know massive political contributions go to government from the gambling industry. They want fewer pokies, perhaps not a maintenance or increase of current levels.'

Crown said it would expand the amount of pokie machines and video gaming tables beneath the new deal, nevertheless the number of pokie machine licenses would stay exactly the same, because it is absorbing current licenses from pubs and clubs. Year additionally, the Victoria government also agreed that a 'super-tax' will also be removed on all high-rolling VIP players from next.

Concessions towards the Crown

This point that is last said O' Brien, will allow Crown to compete with casinos in Macau and Singapore.

' This is a very industry that is competitive. We want to guarantee that high rollers from overseas find an explanation to desire to come to Melbourne to spend their cash,' the treasurer noted.

However, Deakin University gambling researcher and expert Professor Linda Hancock questioned the logic behind this.

' I see no explanation why the federal government should be providing any concessions to Crown, it's quite outrageous really,' she said. 'Crown has been systematically under-taxed for years. These kinds of concessions and deals is component of a election platform and should not have now been brokered in today's world, but this might be a characteristic of gambling policy. The government is so beholden towards the gambling industry, which is providing them this candy to fill government coffers for their election campaign.'

The deal significantly fortifies the position of Crown Resorts and this was reflected in the stock market despite negative publicity. Stocks in the ongoing company rose in the hours following the story initially broke.

Copyright© , 2020 All Rights Reserved.